Bombs Away

USA: Why did you support mujahadeen insurgency in Afghanistan if today you are fighting it off?
China: Why does China supports numerous pariah nations such as Myanmar, Iran, and other African nations?
France: How come you are being accused of participation in the Rwandan crisis?
UK: Is the brittish troops in Aghanistan and Iraq commited with peace or popularity?
Russia: To what extent is Russia's offensive in Georgia tied with the Orange revolution in Ukraine?
South Africa: Where did your nukes go to? Israel?
Sudan: Why is it that non-muslims die by the minute in one area of your country, while the muslim majority in the capital is having record breaking profits?
Venezuela: How deep does your ties to the FARC go? What about the aprehended computer?
Colombia: Loose canon? What is your priority respecting boarders or terminating the Farc?
Georgia: Are the accusations of genocide against you for real?
Pakistan: When are you thinking about expelling the Taliban from your tribal areas?
Afghanistan: Why has Afghani authorities blamed Pakistan for the recent suicide attacks to an Indian embassy in Kabul? Do you have any evidence?
Iran: Arak?

Just to stir things up! and to increase the tensions.

The US supported the Mujahideen when they were fighting off the Soviets, keeping them from taking over Afghanistan.
It was the Cold War and the impedemnt of the spreading of communism was our major objective.
Plus, the Mujahideen does not exist anymore. It has divided up into various groups which act in a way the US dissaproves of.

CONGRATULATIONS DELEGATE! I EXPECT TO SEE MORE FROM THE REST OF THE DELEGATES ENGAGING CONFRONTATION WITH THE SECRETARY GENERAL.

ps. Ana, very well, but that leaves your guard wide open for a big shot! See me later, for I dont want to post it here, it would make your life unfairly harder.

Thank you Secretary General.
The US also looks forward to the other countries' answers!

Secretary General, the South African government dismantled all of its nuclear weapons, being the first and only country to voluntarily dismantle nuclear weapons it developed itself. The country has signed the Biological Weapons Convention since 1975, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty since 1991, and the Chemical Weapons Convention since 1995. However, if Israel posses nuclear weapons, it is not in South Africa's power or knowledge to say so.

Looking forward to other responses!!

"Afghanistan: Why has Afghani authorities blamed Pakistan for the recent suicide attacks to an Indian embassy in Kabul? Do you have any evidence?"

Yes, Afghanistan does blame Pakistan for the recent bombing of the Indian Embassy in Kabul, killing 58 people. The Afghan delegate has concrete evidences for this accusation (though I do think it would be best to keep them as a backup for now): Pakistan has been secretly trying to strain ties between Afghanistan and India since it does not comprehend the necessity of Indian influence in my country. This makes it easier for Pakistan to concentrate its efforts in the Pakistani-Indian conflict over Kashmir when it should be actually focusing on disbanding the Taliban insurgent groups from its safe haven -- western border with Afghanistan. Delegate of Pakistan, Afghanistan is deeply concerned about the future of the Afghan people and of the entire global community with the prospect of a a failing War on Terror, while your government seems more interested in obtaining control over an area that hasn't been entirely yours for what? 60 years?

To me, that's rather inconvenient...
خداحافظ

Secretary General and other UNSC countries,
First of all, China has the freedom to support whatever country we wish to. The preference towards the "pariah ones" as stated, regards that the ones who have more conflicts and civil wars are the ones who should have most of the Interntional attetion and support, since, these, Africa, Iran .... in relation to the "right countries" need guidance in order to achieve peace and complete development.

Dear Secretary general and UNSC countries,
France has been unfairly accused of the Rwanda crisis,throguh a manipulative report by Kigali based on rediculuos assumptions...France was the only nation to actually do something and it is unfair to point fingers at the only nation who took a step forward... France however has already proved its incorruptibility on such unaccetable report and the UN has recognized France diplomatic approach in Rwanda!

In Colombia's defense, I would like to point out, Secretary General, that the FARC, if allowed to grow, will be a problem to the safety and integrity of all the South American nations. Their mortar attacks, kidnappings, and bombings are intolerable. No, we are not a loose cannon, but to put it metaphorically, the best way to exterminate a pest is when it is beginning, not when it's fully grown. The world has allowed the FARC to last for too much time, and it's time to take action. My sincerest apologies to Ecuador for invading their border, but it is better for us to invade their border now than allow the FARC to land terrorist attacks inside Colombia or Ecuador or Venezuela or Brazil or Bolivia or Argentina or Chile or Mexico.

"This makes it easier for Pakistan to concentrate its efforts in the Pakistani-Indian conflict over Kashmir when it should be actually focusing on disbanding the Taliban insurgent groups from its safe haven -- western border with Afghanistan. Delegate of Pakistan, Afghanistan is deeply concerned about the future of the Afghan people and of the entire global community with the prospect of a a failing War on Terror, while your government seems more interested in obtaining control over an area that hasn't been entirely yours for what? 60 years?"

Delegate of Afghanistan, Pakistan has taken appropriate efforts towards the War on Terror campaign, which has been set as the major goal within Asif Ali Zardari´s new government. There have been several meetings, joint-sessions to resolve the invansion and spread of terrorists. In fact, Pakistan had aided Afghanistan with US$250 million directly linked to the combat of terrorists. Also, India and Pakistan have been setting diplomatic relations, have met and discussed the need for the combat of terrorism, and also there is CONCRETE PROOF ABOUT THIS INFORMATION. The delegate of Afghanistan is insulting Pakistan with these false accusations, since both are victims of terrorism, and know exactly the importance of the War on Terror campaign.


Please reflect on what is being said by the delegate of Afghanistan, since Pakistan only seeks the best for the entire international communtiy, and is continuously engaged on the War on Terror campaign, also seeking the best for Afghanistan.

Dear Secretary-General and Security Council Members,

The delegate of Iran is sorry for the delay in joining this forum, but as has been covered quite coercively by Western Media, our magnanimous President, Mr. Ahmadinejad, has been hospitalized due to overwork. Nonetheless, he is bound to continue his marvelous administration of our great nation, and the Iranian diplomatic corps has been assigned directives to vigorously pursue closer relationships with the Security Council members. Despite being snubbed off on its bid to join this all-powerful and influential Council, Iran believes it the right path, as determined by the All-forgiving and Omnipotent Allah, to approach the international community with open arms and strong gestures of good will.

Responding to the Secretary-General's monosyllabic question ("Arak?"), the Iranian Delegation feels compelled to note that, as far as the great nation of the United States of America (and that nation's secret service agencies), Iran stopped its nuclear program back in 2003. Furthermore, neither the Security Council nor the IAEA have been able to identify any evidence of our pursuance of a so-called "aggressive nuclear policy". The delegation of Iran would like to point out the main reason for this obvious and striking lack of evidence towards that hypothesis: There is no such nuclear program for military purposes activated anywhere within Iran's territory. There has never been. There never will be (if we cease to be bullied).

Iran is resolute, however, concerning its rights (under the NPT) to research and develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. It should be clear for the West and for the World that, given the low price of oil and the crisis-scenario of the world economy, optional energy resources have an increased importance within Iran's economy. Iran is trying only to thrive as a relatively young nation in the industrial world. Our growth demands energy, and the government will not stop short of proving its citizens with all the energy they need to develop more and more, making Iran a regional economic force.

As a sign of friendship, Iran is willing to negotiate. Since the times of the Persians we have been good negotiators. But we will not be bullied. If the International Community wants Iran to shut is nuclear program, fine, the government of Iran understands the concerns involved. However, our primary goal is our country's self-preservation, and should the Security Council or the West be ready to start talking in earnest, on mutually benefitial grounds, and based on multilateral solutions to this unfortunate impasse, then Iran is pleased to say: Let's negotiate!

Otherwise.....

Georgia: Are the accusations of genocide against you for real?

Secretary General, these accusations are nothing but superficial and incoherent. Human rights monitors and Western journalists now being admitted to the South Ossetia capital of Tskhinvali can find little evidence to back up Russian claims regarding Georgians committing suicide.
Anyhow, thank you for your interest and the Georgian delegation is always willing to reveal the truth about any case involving it.

Sorry agaun, but like i stated before Iran aka vinny bro, is in his break, Thank you, and he will answer as soon as possible.

Dear secretary general,

The accusations directed at Russia are irrelevent. The soviet union no longer exists. Just because polonium was once used by the KGB and the same was found in Viktor Yushchenko's body, the world cannot blame Russia for the event. Anyone could have poisoned Yushchenko to incriminate Russia.

Russia's interests a directed at achieving a greater goal : PEACE